[JCarlson2004]

Originally Posted by ARCHIE

Not defending, just offering some possible reasons for the basis of his way of thinking and viewing it...the wider gray area, not just, you defend him or condemn him, no inbetween. There are issues here other than just "guilty or not guilty."


Remember, this is a high profile person making millions of $$$ not just
some low life looking to make a fast buck by dog fighting.
He was in it for only two reasons.
1. Hates and has no respect for an animal. To torture an innocent
animal a human being can not be all there. Something in his makeup is missing. Especially someone in the lime light who our youth today look up to.
2. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I see no gray area in this case. The man knew right from wrong no
matter what anyone says. His head is not in the sand, so too speak.
He can read and write. He knows dog fighting is illigel. He took a chance
and got caught. He's been doing this for years. The man deserves
everything that awaits him and I hope it's plenty.

I agree.