[QUOTE=Bizzymammabee;1209874]I don't see the need for the snarkiness. Everyone in here is grown and are entitled to their very own opinion on the subject that is why it's on a public forum. You want to champion on Sylvan then that is your business. But Michiko and Timmy have every right under the sun to state their side. Nothing that they have posted here has been slanderous at all...and it can all be substantiated.
As for your belief that AKC papers have no value unless you are into showing or breeding other than to wall paper a bathroom that too is only your views. If it's not valuable then why did she sell the dog for so much more because of it? Breeders (no slight to the good ones) get way more money because of this piece of paper. So if she paid a whole lot more money to Sylvan because of that paper then it's her due to get it. If Sylvan couldn't or wouldn't produce the papers then she had a right to sell the dog for a lower sum and notify Michiko of the situation.
It is amazing to me how people INSIST on missing the point here.
No one said Michiko is NOT ENTITLED to the Papers! I don't care if she wants to plaster it all over the New York Times!
But the POINT is a person's reputation is being ruined by this very Thread.....without one ounce of Evidence.
If Michiko REALLY wants to settle this once and for all...and if its THAT important to her...then she should contact the AKC ...or a Lawyer. It would make far more sense to me.....
If you come back to me with Evidence that you have been truly treated in a dishonorable way....then I will the first person to give you ALL my sympathy, but until then....posting this sort of personal drama without the other side of the story is grossly unfair.
Would any of you want it done to you? So step in "those shoes" for a moment.....you can't just come in here under the pretext of "Moral Support"...and procede to trash another Member! For God's sake...
Francie |