Quote:
Originally Posted by ColesMommy01  Wow, I can't even fathom why anyone would compare a rape to eating an animal. So I'll ask the same thing I asked Maxdog: Is your issue with how they're killed or because it's dogs they're using as meat? I don't like how they're killed and if they continue to use them as a food source I hope some type of law is put into effect to do it more humanely, but I don't think it's my place to tell someone what they can and can't eat if the meat is treated and killed humanely. |
It's an analogy, don't you see that? At no point did I say rape=eating an animal. And at no point did I ever say this was just about eating an animal. This about the horrific act of unnecessary torture and cruelty via boiling a living creature.
I don't eat dog, nor would I. I don't eat cows, pigs, or chickens either. That doesn't make me better than
anyone, nor does it give me some pass to be more judgmental or less hypocritical when speaking out against horrific practices, in other cultures or our culture. It doesn't equate to "well I don't eat meat, period, so therefore I can realllllly speak out against meat practices whereas meat eaters should not speak out" -- no way is that logical in my book.
My husband eats meat, and I respect it -- but you can be sure he is against cruel torture toward any living being, period.
As far as your thoughts about a potential law someday: BRAVO. I'm right there with you and could not agree more!