Quote:
Originally Posted by lynzy420  I don't know which part of Asia so I am going to assume because of the details not given by the OP and her often self censorship in avoiding keywords etc., I'm going to assume she is in part of Asia where internet activity of common people is heavily/constantly monitored and 100's of thousands are employed doing just that. They do this by picking up keywords and by literally monitoring/reading everything their people do online. People learn, and its a way of life to self censor as a pre emptive control to avoid any involvement with authorities.
I had family that spent 10 years in that part of Asia.
With that said, the reason I have defended the OP is because I am a bit familiar with the treatment of animals/pets in those parts of Asia. Not too long ago a one dog per family law was instituted (yes just like their children)and people were forced to register their pets for a host of social reasons. Those license papers were very expensive and so for a short while they lowered the price and all those that had more than one dog were allowed to register before a set date and be grandfathered into being able to keep all their pets if the license was purchased before the closing date. Many people ran out to get more pups etc., to try to register before the date etc.etc.etc.
The problem with OP's situation is she doesn't have the exact address, she is at the MERCY of these people, if these people have 2 licenses in their house (I'm assuming their dog is depressed because of the recent loss of another family pup) then they could try to keep her Teddy.
By calling the police OP runs in to a gambling situation, because Teddy got out she broke the law and it carries a big fine (under the "leash law") and they may find she is not a good owner because of this and let Teddy stay where he is at or they may simply determine for any reason that Teddy can stay with the people that found him. |
Thank you for this information, can help YT members understand.I was not aware one the one dog per family, was aware of the one child.