YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community


Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us.

Go Back   YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community > YorkieTalk > Yorkie Health & Diet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2005, 05:18 PM   #1
Donating YT Addict
 
azkaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 483
Omg Extreme Warning!!please Read!!

WARNING!!
For all of you that use the "Swiffer" mop system STOP IMMEDIATELY!! This mop is impregnated with antifreeze and will kill your babies! Dogs and cats will walk across the floors of your home-- they can lick their feet and ingest the antifreeze.. the liver will be irrepairable damaged and you will lose your baby! The mop has a very small warning about using with children or animals around..for the sake of your pets-- get rid of the Swiffer mops!
__________________
Katy
azkaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!

WidgetBucks - Trend Watch - WidgetBucks.com
Old 10-04-2005, 05:33 PM   #2
Double Trouble
Donating Member
 
babi1542's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 4,658
Default

Oh my gosh! Thank you for warning us!
__________________
PEBBLES AND SASHA
MY DOGS ARE NOT SPOILED...I'M JUST WELL TRAINED!
babi1542 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 05:34 PM   #3
My Little Princess
Donating Member
 
SWEETPEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SUNNY,FLORIDA
Posts: 2,617
Default

wow thanks for the warning
__________________

RACHEL & MISTY:
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!
SWEETPEA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 05:39 PM   #4
YT Addict
 
Hamoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 354
Default

http://www.aspca.org/site/News2?page...dInterest=TRUE

Bogus. Thats totally false. It's one of those wierd internet hoaxes.

Quote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Urbana, IL) May 6, 2004 -- Veterinary toxicologists at the ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center have reviewed the claim described in a widely distributed email alleging a relationship between the use of Swiffer Wet Jet and liver failure in a dog. The email alleges that exposure to the ingredients in Swiffer Wet Jet caused a dog's death.

The Swiffer Wet Jet system contains water (90-100%), propylene glycol n-propyl ether or propylene glycol n-butyl ether and isopropyl alcohol (1-4%). These ingredients are safe to use around pets when used according to label directions and would not cause liver damage at product concentrations. Propylene glycol n-butyl/propyl ether differs significantly from ethylene glycol, the potentially toxic ingredient present in most antifreeze products. Ethylene glycol is frequently implicated in causing renal failure in dogs following antifreeze ingestion. Propylene glycol n-propyl ether and propylene glycol n-butyl ether are very safe ingredients at levels used in cleaning products and do not cause kidney or liver failure.

The ASPCA will continue to monitor this situation and will post any additional information as it becomes available. Please call 1-888-426-4435 if you have any questions or have a pet that you suspect is experiencing problems, or visit us at http://www.apcc.aspca.org/.
Hamoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 05:43 PM   #5
Donating YT Addict
 
azkaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 483
Default

I think I would not ant to use any product that has glycol in it..
Why would there be a waning on the lable about it, if there was not some issue?
__________________
Katy
azkaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 05:53 PM   #6
YT Addict
 
Hamoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Propylene glycol n-butyl/propyl ether differs significantly from ethylene glycol
I understand your concern, and applaud your dedication to your pets, but htis is SERIOUSLY bogus and a total non-issue.

Glycol is not a substance. It's a part of a word. I believe it means that it has been chemically bonded with Glycerine. Glycerine can prevent heart attacks. Ethanol is the alcohol in beer. It causes liver damage. Ethanol merged with Glycerine produces ethylene glycol. That will WRECK your liver if you drink a glass of it. IT will have almost no impact in small amount like licking the residue.

Now let's talk about the floor cleaner. Propylene Glycal.

Here's what the govnment has to say about it:
Quote:
Propylene glycol is generally regarded as safe for use in food.
USed in FOOD. However, I would not drink a gallon of it...all cleaning products have warning labels. If you spurn it for having a warning label (keep it away from kids, use htis to clean floors not for a tasty beverage), do you spurn all cleaning products? SOAP is dangerous to eat, but we don't stop cleaning with it...

The aspca would not retract this if it were remotely dangerous to do so.

Here's more info on the difference between the ingredient in anti-freeze and what's in this floor cleaner. I should also add that propylene glycol evaporates rapidly. A dog walking on your floor would not be able to get any on his feet if you had cleaned with it. REGARDLESS, it's still used in food, and totally safe.
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts96.html
Quote:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified propylene glycol as an additive that is "generally recognized as safe" for use in food. It is used to absorb extra water and maintain moisture in certain medicines, cosmetics, or food products. It is a solvent for food colors and flavors.
Hamoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 06:10 PM   #7
Donating YT Addict
 
azkaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 483
Default

Of course, I am curious.. are you a chemist or a Doctor?
__________________
Katy
azkaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 06:20 PM   #8
YT 500 Club Member
 
Gracy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamoth
http://www.aspca.org/site/News2?page...dInterest=TRUE

Bogus. Thats totally false. It's one of those wierd internet hoaxes.
Glad to see you found this article.
Last year 2004 in April, this was going around. At the time I worked for a Vet.
They checked into it, It's bogus.
Don't worry out there.
__________________
Gracy, Yorkie Lover S
Lulu Lily Woody
Gracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 06:21 PM   #9
YT 1000 Club Member
 
lilbumbleybees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,234
Default

So long as you let it completely dry before allowing your babies on the floor, you are OK. Been using it since it came out and never had a problem. It's the same as with any household cleaner. Let it completely dry before letting your babies on the floor. If you really are nervous about it. Use your swiffer, then go over the floor with a mop and plain old waters afterwards and then let that dry as well. Hope this "unfreaks" some people out.
__________________
Miss Liz
Little Lotte Bouncer Lilli Yodi
lilbumbleybees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 06:24 PM   #10
Donating YT Addict
 
azkaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 483
Default

Thank you for your reply,

The reason that I posted my message deals with the fact that I recently received a message from a dear friend in reference to the "swiffer" product, after a liver biopsy on his pet.... and this is not the first instance of this problem that I have been alerted too. It appears that the contents of the "swiffer"product may indeed have attributed to the death of his pet. The "small print" on the label of the product contains a disclaimer stating that the contents of the product ""may be harmful" if ingested by children or animals. A liver biopsy of his pet revealed extremely high levels of a substance contaminating his liver..and the pet was NEVER out of his sight. I feel a personal responsibility to alert owners that the product may indeed be harmful to their pets. It is their decision to research this product.
__________________
Katy
azkaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 07:23 AM   #11
Yorkie Talker
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: new jersey
Posts: 23
Default

I hope this is bogus I just cleaned my floor with swiffer, and as I was doing this Bailey loves to bark at the mop and run all over the floor, as he also does when I use a broom or vacuum.
Mybailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 04:46 PM   #12
YT Addict
 
Hamoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azkaty
Of course, I am curious.. are you a chemist or a Doctor?
Neither, but I have taken some chemistry classes and that's where I learned about deciphering chemical names. Chemicals are named with a certain system so that upon hearing the name, you know exactly what compounds are involved and how they are joined.

The other reason I felt quite safe to pronounce my judgement on this is that the ASPCA had a page on it, the swiffer folks had a page on it, and I fully understood the materials that were presented. I've been online for a long, long, time and have seen my share of "important warining, please read and forward to everyone you know!" emails. This had the chacteristics of one so I checked it out and found it to be bogus.

Here's more refferences from trusted sources who have checked this out:

http://hoaxbusters.ciac.org/HBUrbanMyths.shtml#swiffer <-- read the original 2004 verified HOAX email. It sounds EXACTLY like what is being repeated here.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/librar...fer_wetjet.htm

http://www.bighoaxes.com/hoaxe_4_68.html

Here's a page with lots of other email hoaxes about toxins sorted by true or false...
http://www.snopes.com/toxins/toxins.asp
Hamoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 12:53 PM   #13
YT Addict
 
goldcupmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 371
Default

My best friend's SIL in Co. lost her dog after a floor licking episode over a year ago and the vet at the university determined that the swiffer formula had a "significant impact" on the cause of death. They never came right out and said it caused it, but it did contribute.
goldcupmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 05:41 PM   #14
Donating YT Addict
 
azkaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 483
Default

Sounds like there may be something to this after all?
__________________
Katy
azkaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 03:52 PM   #15
YT Addict
 
Hamoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldcupmom
My best friend's SIL in Co. lost her dog after a floor licking episode over a year ago and the vet at the university determined that the swiffer formula had a "significant impact" on the cause of death. They never came right out and said it caused it, but it did contribute.

Could you provide the name of the vet? So far nobody has been able to turn up a single example of this, so if it's legit the ASPCA should know right away because this anecdote runs contrary to every bit of available information. No vet is on record saying that this product is even remotely dangerous.

If you know where we can find a vet who has found otherwise, then he should be contacted for verification of this. It's entirely possible that your friend may have gotten confused about somethign the vet said, or is filling in details after suffering a tradgedy, getting this email, and then feeling that swiffer was the cause.

Untill that's shown, this remains an anyonymous unsourced opinion to me...It's always somone's friend, no offense...I woudln't contradict you if this weren't a known hoax with veterinary toxicologists agreeing that this product is 100% safe.
Hamoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Google
 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2003 - 2008 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487