YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community


Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us.

Go Back   YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community > All Else > Off Topic Discussions
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar JavaChat Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-30-2005, 02:25 PM   #1
Tilly & Sami
Donating Member
 
jbarile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Syracuse, Utah
Posts: 1,133
Controversy ..with Doris Day animal action

Ok I can see there is a problem here... and I believe there is a controversy with this Doris Day animal action.. in Regards to All you good breeders!!
and I do mean good!! Unfortunately there are more BAD breeders..
AKA ("Puppymill breeders" )Than good!! and puppymill breeders outweigh the Good! This is what millbusters and other organizations are all about shutting down puppymills !! fur trade etc.. Good breeders more than likely fall under this statute! I do respect your right to be against the doris day animal action, And I believe you all hate puppymills as much as the next!. But my Issue is directed at CC's post
That this a bad bill?? posted in the thread (please sign the Doris Day animal action) which I feel was a very selfish reason to say it has nothing to do with Puppymills when Indeed it does! she clearly was not thinking about the contents of this Bill only that it will effect her! and I posted the FACTS underneath her post "That her statement Is False" along with the link so she can become educated with that bill! I commend all others that had choose to ignore the thread without prejudice there were 63 views and only 7 signature's! And My Apology If I have offended anyone with my views or opinions
jbarile is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!

Old 07-30-2005, 02:41 PM   #2
YT 1000 Club Member
 
jesscruz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: seaside,ca
Posts: 1,763
Default

please do not apologize for your views and opinions! everyone is entitled to them. that is what makes this site great is everyone has their own views and opinions about things and that;s how we learn.
__________________
mommy's little baby coco bear
jesscruz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2005, 03:19 PM   #3
YT Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 402
Default

I respect your thoughts but also think if you just read the AR sites, DDAL, PETA and even AKC your only getting part of the story. All opinions are able to be shared I think.

Sorry if you feel I worry only about how this will effect me. This is not the case at all. In fact I am one of the few breeders it will not effect. I don't breed enough, import dogs, co own, or have "other" animals.

I just would like people to read all sides and the Bill itself to be fully informed.
Most all dog clubs are against this Bill as it is written.

If you read the bill it doesn't have anything in it to cover care or treatment of animals. No rule to keep rescue from falling under the guidelines of "dealer". It doesn't stop you from having 500 breeding dogs to sell to pet stores. It's a licensing bill.

Here is a couple possible things that could happen with the way this bill is written.

A show breeder who has 1 male and 1 female and breeds 1 litter a year to show loses their dam to an accident. Wanting to keep the same bloodlines, that happen to be Canadian the breeder ships in a CH female. Opps, she imported a breeding dog and now must be USDA licensed. That means her breeding dogs must be kept like livestock. Now will she do this or just stop breeding?

A breeder who shows and has 2-3 litters a year, does all her testing and has wonderful dogs is also active in 4H with her children.
They sell a CH goat for $501.00. Now she will have to get a USDA license?

A breeder who has 200 males and 200 females who sells to pet stores and never pays any mind to standards or health has 200 litters a year. They are already USDA licensed. (most puppymills are already USDA breeders) No change for them at all.............

There are just to many things wrong in this bill. It will not effect USDA breeders at all. If they are worried about all the importing of dogs, and selling straight to the public by high volume breeders they should address that and not leave it open to what can happen the way it is now. AKC says USDA will have to change rules for "in home" hobby breeders. Just because they think they should doesn't mean they will.
CC's is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2005, 04:32 PM   #4
Tilly & Sami
Donating Member
 
jbarile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Syracuse, Utah
Posts: 1,133
Default

Hi, CC's
Your Post seemed to signify that the Doris Day animal action bill as nothing to do with puppymills and this is what I am addressing nothing more nothing less based on your statement as follows..

This is a very bad bill as its written that does nothing to help the welfare of puppies or stop mills


My only reason of response here was with this statement, which discourages one not to sign or signify that this is a false statement! and misleading as well as your highly (The "YTCA is officially against it" ) that is a yorkshire terrier club? A Club!

The Humane Society of These United States Officially indorsed it!

http://www.hsus.org/legislation_laws/


here is the bill Doris Day Animal League


Puppy Mill Campaign

Congress Introduces Bill to End Puppy Mill Abuse
May 26, 2005 -- Today the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives introduced a bill to regulate large, commercial pet breeding operations that sell directly to the public. This bill, entitled the Pet Animal Welfare Statute (S. 1139/H.R. 2669) will close a loophole that exempts the sale of puppies over the Internet and through newspaper ads.

Young puppies are often transported across state lines to unsuspecting consumers who are unable to see the conditions the animal was bred in.

“This bill is long overdue and truly welcomed by the humane community,” said Sara Amundson of DDAL. "This is a significant first step in seeking parity between the federal Animal Welfare Act’s requirements for large, commercial breeders selling to pet stores and to the public."
Ask your Members of Congress to support S. 1139/H.R. 2669.

What is a "Puppy Mill?"
A "puppy mill" is a facility that continuously breeds female dogs, housing them and their puppies in deplorable conditions. Inadequate food, water, sanitation, constant exposure to the elements and dilapidated housing are commonplace.

Because of these inhumane conditions, many puppies sold from these mills suffer from chronic physical ailments and may be fearful of people and other animals. These inhumane and abusive conditions have been the subjects of television reports and newspaper articles nationwide. Read U.S. Representative Ed Whitfield's editorial on puppy mill legislation.

How You Can Help Stop Puppy Mills
Write a Letter to the Editor of your local newspaper and help bring needed attention to this issue!
Adopt a puppy from a shelter or rescue group.
Help bolster our case for stronger regulations. Send DDAL newspaper articles about the animal cruelty and inhumane conditions found at puppy mills of dealers selling directly to the public.


The “kitchen sink” rule signed by Dr. DeHaven affects the Animal Welfare Act pertaining to inspection, licensing, and procurement of animals. These changes will vastly improve enforcement of the Act, close loopholes that allow individuals to thwart the intentions of the law, and better protect the animals the law covers. Of particular significance, the new rule strengthens the USDA’s hand in denying or revoking licenses when individuals have violated animal cruelty laws or are otherwise judged to be “unfit to be licensed” or when issuing a license would “be contrary to the purposes of the Act.” These common-sense changes were supported by both animal protection organizations and the regulated community.

Rep. Ed Whitfield on the Puppy Protection Act
Since the passage of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) in 1966, and its subsequent amendments in 1970 and 1985, Congress has demonstrated its commitment to ensuring that appropriate care, handling and transport are provided to puppies bred in commercial breeding establishments. It has charged the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) with licensing and regulating breeders who mass produce puppies for sale to pet stores.

The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC) estimates that 3,500 to 3,700 of the approximately 12,000 pet stores in this country sell dogs and cats and that those stores sell as many as 400,000 puppies each year. In addition, hundreds of thousands of puppies are sold directly to the public, increasingly over the Internet. Americans can simply type any breed into a search engine and find breeders who will ship a puppy to their home. Currently, breeders who mass produce puppies and sell them directly to the public are not regulated by the USDA, leaving a gaping hole in coverage under the AWA.

One of the significant problems associated with USDA enforcement of the AWA is the lack of resources available to the agency. This very concern is one of the strongest reasons why I introduced the “Puppy Protection Act,” H.R. 3484, which will give USDA the authority to focus on repeat offenders and put them out of business. This provision is our “three strikes and you’re out” rule and it’s a much needed tool for the agency.

In addition, nothing in the Animal Welfare Act regulates the number of times in a given year a breeding female can be bred. In a recent article (from The Ontonagon Herald – upper peninsula of Michigan), a breeder was seeking a loan to expand his business explaining that the ultimate goal was to have 300 breeding females and 60 males on the property, with each female having two litters per year. The puppies would then be sold at $400 per dog. Initially, they planned to sell to pet shops but want to sell through newspaper ads and on the Internet. The “Puppy Protection Act” would ensure that, while these puppies are sold through pet stores, the females could only have three litters in two years, reducing the burden on these animals.

More than 58 million homes in this country consider a dog part of the family – and yet approximately 5 million dogs and cats are still euthanized in our shelter system each year due to the lack of good homes, the inability for the dog to socialize with people or other dogs, or simply because a family moved to a “no-pets” building. For those Americans who elect to purchase a purebred puppy, the “Puppy Protection Act” will further protect animals raised in commercial breeding facilities and sold through pet stores.

Published in the Summer 2004 Animal Guardian.

First elected to Congress in 1994, Ed Whitfield is serving his fifth term as U.S. Representative for the 34 counties of Kentucky’s First Congressional District. In addition to sponsoring the Puppy Protection Act, he has championed the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act, which bans the slaughter of horses for human consumption.


Animal Welfare Act Enforcement
Congress increased funding for enforcement of this important law that ensures the welfare of animals in breeding facilites, exhibitions, and laboratories.











© 2005 Doris Day Animal League. Privacy Policy

http://www.ddal.org/puppymills/
http://www.hsus.org/pets/pets_relate...ents/paws.html
jbarile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2005, 05:07 PM   #5
Tilly & Sami
Donating Member
 
jbarile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Syracuse, Utah
Posts: 1,133
Default

Analysis of PAWS (SB1139/HR2669)
[Thursday, June 09, 2005]
-- Click here for more information about PAWS --


To help dog owners better understand the recently introduced PAWS legislation, please see the bill analysis below as prepared by Dr. James Holt, AKC's federal government relations consultant.


SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS OF S. 1139/H.R. 2669, THE "PET ANIMAL WELFARE STATUTE" (PAWS) INTRODUCED MAY 26, 2005.


Sec. 1. Short Title

This Act is named the "Pet Animal Welfare Statute of 2005".

Sec. 2. Definitions

This section rearranges the definitions in Section 2 of the Act to place them in alphabetical order, amends the definition of the term "dealer" and adds a definition of the term "retail pet store".

Analysis

Current law defines as a dealer any person who sells dogs for research, teaching, exhibition, or for use in hunting, breeding, security or as a pet and is not a "retail pet store", but does not define the term "retail pet store". The USDA,by regulation, defines a "retail pet store" as any person who sells dogs for hunting, breeding or security or use as a pet exclusively at retail. This regulatory interpretation has been challenged in court as overly broad, but has been upheld. The AKC participated as an amicus in defending the USDA's regulatory interpretation.

It is important to note that current law does not contain any exemption for hobby and show breeders. Hobby and show breeders are exempt from licensing based on the "retail pet store" statutory exemption, coupled with the USDA's regulatory interpretation that any person who sells dogs exclusively at retail is a retail pet store. Thus, hobby and show breeders are currently exempt from regulation solely by virtue of being classified as retail pet stores. While the USDA has interpreted the term retail pet store broadly in regulation for the more than 30 years since the enactment of this exemption, it is just a regulatory interpretation, and it could be changed simply by the USDA writing and justifying a new regulation.

When the current definition of dealer and the exemption for retail pet stores was enacted, the language did, as a practical matter, separate commercial from amateur breeders, because, as a practical matter, it was difficult to sell large numbers of puppies without resorting to selling at least some of them at wholesale. However, with the advent of the internet and mass media outlets, this is no longer true. The USDA, our own inspectors and fancy, and the animal welfare community are all now aware of large breeders who, by any reasonable definition of the term are commercial breeders, but who sell all of their animals at retail over the internet and/or through mass media. These breeders raise dozens, or even hundreds, of litters a year. Yet because all of the puppies are sold at retail, they evade any federal regulation. In the last few years, persons have begun importing increasing numbers of puppies for resale, also largely over the internet and/or through the mass media, although some auction houses and retail pet stores are also importing puppies directly for resale. Since these puppies are bred and raised overseas, and sold directly at retail by the importers, they are completely outside the legal reach of the USDA.

The section amends the definition of "dealer" to include persons who sell dogs at retail regardless of whether or not they bred any of the dogs or cats sold, unless the person is a retail pet store, narrowly defined, or a hobby or show breeder, narrowly defined. It brings under federal regulation persons who import dogs and/or sell dogs at retail who do not meet one of three exemption criteria: (1) they sell 25 or fewer dogs per year; (2) they sell only dogs or cats which they bred or raised on their own premises and whelp 6 or fewer litters per year; or, (3) they meet the statutory definition of a retail pet store. Note the use of the word "or" in the statute. A toy breeder, for example, who sells 25 or fewer dogs per year would not be a dealer, even if they whelped more than 6 litters.

To be defined as a dealer a person must sell dogs "in commerce, for compensation or profit". This language should exclude legitimate not-for-profit rescue groups, shelters, and the like. The language for defining such groups will have to be fleshed out in regulations, however the USDA currently exempts not-for-profits, and there is no reason to believe they will not continue to do so. On the other hand, we will want to advocate for covering organizations that make a profit from importing and/or selling dogs, even if they call themselves shelters or rescue organizations. (The AKC will need to be active in the regulation writing process.)

With respect to co-breeders and co-owners, the USDA defines as the seller of a dog the person who operates the premises from which the dog is sold, not other co-owners or co-breeders. Analogizing from current regulations, the puppies sold from the premises of each party would be attributed to that pary. Puppies sold from the premises of one co-breeder would not be attributed to the other co-breeder.

The amended definition will bring importers, internet retailers and other mass market retailers under regulation, an important goal for protecting purebred dogs. It also for the first time will give hobby and show breeders a specific statutory exemption, rather than having to rely on being classified as retail pet stores.

Sec. 3 Access to Source Records for Dogs and Cats.

This section amends Section 10 of the Act pertaining to required recordkeeping by adding a subsection requiring that all persons defined as "dealers" and "retail pet stores" prepare, retain and make available for inspection by the Secretary records of the name and address of all persons from whom each cat or dog is acquired and whether that person is required to be licensed under the Act.

Analysis

Section 10(a) [as redesignated by the PAWS] of the Act sets forth the authority of the Secretary to require dealers and exhibitors to prepare, retain, and produce upon request records set forth by the Secretary in regulations. Since this requirement applies
further reading please use link

http://www.akc.org/news/index.cfm?article_id=2525

Last edited by jbarile; 07-30-2005 at 05:09 PM.
jbarile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2005, 06:08 PM   #6
YT Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 402
Default

This will be my last post on this, its long but I think there will be enough information for people to read, look up, and make up their own minds now.

Yes YTCA is a club. As are other dog clubs that protect their breed. They also do rescue, fight puppy mills and abuse.
Also I would not like to see dog lovers support a bill that will eventually limit their choice of breeder to USDA breeders or BYBs and maybe once in a very long while a breeder that falls in the just right category.

What you are posting is not the actual bill, but DDAL's interpretation of it. I believe people should see all sides, (including reading the actual bill). Not just DDAL/HSUS/PETA and even AKC's pages .
I know of breeders leaving AKC and going to UKC because of their support of this bill. (not bad breeders either)

No I don't think this bill in its present form will stop puppy mills or help the health of the companion pets.

IMO, mills are set up because of the money from supply and demand. Make a bill that stops companion animals being sold by pet shops or brokers. Make it that people can only buy a pup directly from the breeder at their facility. Once people see how these dogs are cared for, mills will go out of business due to no one supporting them. I would sign up on that in a nano-second!

I know I will not convince you I am thinking of the best for the future of the pet world, but I am. I will not try to change your mind. I post this for others who are unaware of the other side of the story.

Here's a few more links and a partial list of animal people against P.A.W.S.

http://saova.org/1139.html
http://www.pet-law.com/statelists.html
http://www.thedogplace.com/TheDogPre...or_Thought.asp

Animal Advocacy Organizations Opposing S1139/HR2669 (PAWS)
National Groups
Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council
Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance
Cat Fanciers' Association
The Animal Council
National Animal Interest Alliance
American Dog Owners' Association
United Kennel Club
Master of Fox Hounds Association
The International Cat Association
The International Bengal Cat Society
U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance
National Birman Fanciers (CFA)
White Shetland Sheepdog Association
Ocicats International
The Devon Rex Breed Club
The Rabbit Education Society
On-Line Feline Fanciers
National Pet Alliance
The Polish Tatra Sheepdog Club of America
Ragdolls of America Group (CFA)
Tonkinese Breed Association

AKC Parent Breed Clubs
American Brittany Club
American Shetland Sheepdog Association
American Chesapeake Club
German Shorthaired Pointer Club of America
American Pomeranian Club
Papillon Club of America
Dachshund Club of America
Pug Dog Club of America
English Springer Spaniel Field Trial Association
Yorkshire Terrier Club of America
Chinese Shar-Pei Club of America
American Spaniel Club
American Boxer Club
Saluki Club of America
Saint Bernard Club of America
Scottish Terrier Club of America
American Cavalier King Charles Spaniel Club
Labrador Retriever Club of America
American Brussels Griffon Association
-
The clubs shown above represent 42.4% of AKC's registrations.

Statewide Organizations
Virginia Hunting Dog Owners' Association
Dog Federation of Wisconsin
California Federation of Dog Clubs
Missouri Federation of Animal Owners
Responsible Pet Owners Alliance (Texas)
North Carolina Responsible Animal Owners' Alliance
Federation of Maine Dog Clubs
Virginia Bear Hunters Association
Responsible Animal Owners of Tennessee
Illinois Federation of Outdoor Resources
PUFF (Pfanciers United For Fun, Inc.) (Midwest)
North Carolina Field Trial Association
CT Dogs (CT)
Amateur Field Trial Clubs of America - Region 12 (AZ & NM)
Amateur Field Trial Clubs of America - Region 7 (TX)
Nebraska Brittany Club
Prairie State Cat Club (IL, IN & MI)
Field Trial Clubs of Illinois
Hoosier State Chinese Shar-Pei Club (IN)
Montana State Houndsmen Association
Illinois Regional Brittany Club
Illinois Brittany Championship Association
Alaska Winds Coursing Club (AK)

Local Organizations
Carolina Kennel Club, Inc. (NC)
Alliance of Responsible Pet Owners of N.E. Florida
Greater Clark County Kennel Club (WA)
Schooley's Mountain Kennel Club (NJ)
Jacksonville NC Kennel Club
Central Carolina Dachshund Club (NC)
Greater Orange Park Dog Club, Inc (FL)
Clermont County Kennel Club (OH)
Piedmont Kennel Club (NC)
Dalmatian Club of the Piedmont
Springfield Kennel Club (MA)
Burlington Cat Fanciers (NC)
Tropical Cats Inc. (FL)
Western Clinton Sportsmen's Association (PA)
New Brunswick Kennel Club (NJ)
Thunderkatz, Inc. (OK)
St. Croix Valley Brittany Club (MN)
Fanciers Cocker Spaniel Club of Southern WI
Susquehanna Brittany Club (PA)
Salisbury Kennel Club (NC)
LNC Pet Supply (CA)
Memphis International Cat Enthusiasts (TN)
East of Eden Cat Fanciers (CA)
Colonial Shetland Sheepdog Club (MA)
Western Massachusetts Shetland Sheepdog Club
Greater Fort Myers Dog Club (FL)
Capitol City Cocker Club (DC)
Sunshine Dachshund Club of Jacksonville (FL)
Absolutely Abyssinians Cat Club (FL)
Sawnee Mountain Kennel Club (GA)
Eugene Kennel Club (OR)
Salt Lake Doberman Pinscher Club (UT)
Cochise Bird Dog Club (AZ)
Blue Ridge P.E.T.S.(Pets in Education and Therapy Service) (VA)
German Shorthaired Pointer Club of Central Virginia
Sacramento Bird Dog Club (CA)
Triangle Shetland Sheepdog Club of North Carolina
Harmony Bay Chinese Shar-Pei Club (WA)
Sussex Hills Kennel Club (NJ)
Ohio Valley Dog Owners, Inc.
Hudson Valley Brittany Club (NY)
Garden State Siberian Husky Club (NJ)
Burlington Obedience Training Club, Inc. (VT)
Raritan River Akita Club (NJ)
Kittyhawk Felines, Inc. (OH)
Centennial Chinese Shar-Pei Club (CO)
Shenandoah Valley Kennel Club (VA)
Walkfar Coonhunter’s Coon Club (NC)
Rocky Mountain Mastiff Fanciers (CO)
ILLOWA Chinese Shar-Pei Club (IL & IA)
Shasta Kennel Club (OR)
Golden Retriever Club of Western New York
Shetland Sheepdog Club of Greater Detroit (MI)
German Shepherd Dog Club of Greater Kansas City
Clackamas Kennel Club (OR)
Doberman Pinscher Club of Northern California
Northern Washington Chinese Shar Pei Club
Idaho Capital City Kennel Club

Rescues
Turkish Van Breed Rescue
Lhasa Apso Southern Rescue, Inc. (MS)
Great Dane Rescue of Northeast Florida
Jacksonville Sheltie Rescue (FL)
North American Shar-Pei Rescue
Pug Rescue of North Carolina, Inc.
Birman Breed Rescue
New England Sheltie Rescue
Devon Rex Rescue League, Inc.
Animal Safe Haven Foundation (CA)
Bay Area Boxer Rescue (CA)
Dalmatian Rescue of Southwest Virginia
CFA Purebred Rescue, Inc.
KitnHevn Rescue, Inc. (FL & OH)
Halfpint Haven Borzoi and Greyhound Rescue, Inc. (FL)
Louisiana Brittany Rescue
Golden Retriever Rescue of Mid-Florida
Bulldog Club of America Rescue Network
Miss Kitty's Cat House (AZ)
Helping Persian Cats, Inc. (CA)
American Brittany Rescue (NJ)
Selkirk Rex Breed Rescue (CA)
Oregon Basset Hound Rescue
Friends of Rescued Mastiffs
Golden Retriever Rescue of Maine
Colorado Animal Rescue Effort
CC's is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2005, 06:41 PM   #7
Tilly & Sami
Donating Member
 
jbarile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Syracuse, Utah
Posts: 1,133
Default

Thank you! I will do my homework. and thanks for all the links! I really didn't want to come off as If I knew it all and I apologize for the education comment! after I posted and read it it wasn't a proper thing to say!
I guess the whole Issue of this bill is just too damn confusing as you can see post after post I was finding this bill related to the puppymill closure. So I suggest to everyone to really read between the lines, because it appears obivious to me I need to look into it alot further! I appreciate your side of this issue and again I apologize
jbarile is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Google
 

SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167